http://smokker.com/news/04-08-06/Customs-seize-illicit-cigarettes.1694.html



Customs officers seized 3m counterfeit and illegally imported cigarettes in the North West in one 24-hour period.


HM Revenue and Customs officials said the seizures, which took place between 27 and 28 July, offer a snapshot of the ongoing work to tackle tobacco fraud.

The figure includes more than 2.5m non-UK duty paid cigarettes seized in an industrial unit in Lancashire.

Officers also stopped 34 passengers carrying 157,410 cigarettes through Manchester and Liverpool airports.

Freight consignments

Linda Paul, HMRC head of detection in the North West, said they were determined to stop those bringing tobacco illegally into the country.

She said their actions were responsible for undercutting small business, undermining efforts to reduce smoking and depriving the Exchequer of valuable tax revenue.

During the 24-hour period last week, customs officers seized cigarettes being posted to UK addresses and found other consignments hidden in freight containers.

"This illegal activity should be condemned by the public," said Mrs Paul.

"Cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting is an organised crime as these routine seizures demonstrate, often linked to money laundering and drugs."

http://us-cigs.com/news/04.08.06/Cleveland-mayor-backs-cigarettes-tax-for-arts.1652.html




Mayor Frank Jackson and members of City Council said Thursday they support a Cuyahoga County proposal to add a cigarette tax to boost funding for the arts.


Cash-strapped cities such as Cleveland have to consider creative ways to offer public funds to the arts, and this tax would help the city's creative vitality without adding to income or property tax burdens, Jackson said.

"It is the overall quality of life and the well-being of citizens we are talking about, and one aspect of that is what art and culture brings to the table," Jackson said.

The city's museums, theaters and orchestra are well known, but creativity in neighborhoods among small art groups needs greater support, even though the arts usually are not a priority when residents are worried about schools and crime, the mayor said.

Voters will be asked to approve a 30-cent increase in Cuyahoga County's cigarette tax to finance arts and culture. County commissioners voted 3-0 on July 5 to place the proposal before voters on the Nov. 7 ballot.

If approved, the tax would raise about $20 million annually and would be allocated by the county commissioners. All arts and cultural groups and projects in the county would be allowed to compete for funding.

The county tax would provide local artists with another resource besides the Ohio Arts Council, a state agency that funds and supports the arts with funds from the Legislature and the National Endowment for the Arts.

On June 20, the Arts Council board approved the first round of grants for fiscal year 2007. The council awarded 429 grants totaling $7.8 million to support arts organizations and arts programs across Ohio. Organizations that receive OAC funds are required to match state tax dollars with additional public and private funds.

The ballot issue will have opposition. The Small Business Coalition, a nonprofit organization including small Cleveland-area stores where cigarettes are sold, is on record against the tax.

"We think this would be a negative economic impact for the community," said Gary Nolan, president of small business group.

Nolan, a smoker, said the organization does not agree that more public funding of the arts is needed.

"Why does art deserve my tax dollars? If it were such a great investment, the free market would invest in it," Nolan said. "We also don't think government needs to be involved in deciding which artist gets which amount of money, or who is truly is an artist."

In 2004, Cuyahoga County voters defeated a property tax proposal to finance arts and economic development projects.

If approved, the state and county taxes on cigarettes sold in the county would be about $1.60 a pack, a portion of which has been used to help finance a baseball stadium for the Cleveland Indians and a basketball arena for the Cleveland Cavaliers.

It has the support of the Cleveland area's Community Partnership for Arts and Culture.

State Sen. Erie Fingerhut, a Cleveland-area Democrat, is managing the campaign for the tax and said Cleveland needs a vibrant arts environment like the one in Toronto.

"The reason we're doing this is because of the economic needs of the city and county," Fingerhut said. A more vibrant arts community would attract business and people to the Cleveland area, he said.

http://hot-cigs.com/news/Aug-04-2006/New-Outdoor-Ashtray-Hits-the-Market.1687.html



Sylvain Bourdeau had his Eureka! moment when he spotted the ground littered with cigarette butts outside a Boucher-ville bar on the eve of Quebec's ban on smoking in public places. "It hit me like a flash what people do with their cigarette butts," Bourdeau said yesterday, recalling his May 30 epiphany.


The image also reminded him of Montreal Mayor Gerald Tremblay's pledge to clear city streets and sidewalks of unsightly cigarette butts.

Marcel Tremblay, the mayor's brother and city councillor in charge of the clean-up program, referred to a billion butts discarded in public yearly.

"I had a vision and two days later, I got to work on it," Bourdeau said of his subsequent invention - the patent-pending I Kkwit Ashtray Tower.

Bourdeau, an Ecole des hautes etudes commerciales marketing graduate, said he added the second K to the name because a search found that the word "kwit" was already taken for another product.

"Besides, the letter K has strong business association to companies like Kodak and Kellogg's," he added.

The St. Jean-sur-Richelieu entrepreneur - he and his father, Jerome, started up Jer-B-Syl Inc. and the younger Bourdeau continues to operate the manufacturer of polyethylene baskets and trays for fruits and vegetables - spent $1,200 on a prototype of the 1.4-metre-tall ashtray.

Bourdeau is marketing the aluminum ashtray to three levels of government (350 Quebec municipalities alone), bars, restaurants, hospitals and companies.

The price, a few hundred dollars each depending on the quantity bought, includes installation, a choice of 400 colours and a 10-year guarantee even though Bourdeau suggests the ashtray will last at least 25 years without rusting.

Twenty-five are now being built on order at a subcontracted hometown company he said is capable of producing 50 to 100 a week.

The plan is also to rent the ashtrays for events and eventually sell advertising on them, making them revenue-generating.

Bourdeau claims he refused an offer of $250,000 last week for 30 per cent of the company "because I think my business will be worth a lot more than that before long."

He said he also turned down a potential partner who wanted to have the ashtrays made cheaply in China.

"I insist in staying in Quebec," Bourdeau said.

"I'm already creating local jobs with this project and I'd like to see something made in Quebec that will eventually be exported worldwide."

Although he hasn't yet officially contacted them, Bourdeau wants to donate $10 from the sale of each ashtray to the Canadian Cancer Society.

http://smokker.com/news/21-07-06/Smoking-ban-set-for-31-Bob-Evans-locations.1278.html




Bob Evans Restaurants will ban smoking at 31 locations in southwest Ohio and Northern Kentucky beginning Monday, July 31. The public company decided to ban smoking because of customer complaints and the U.S. Surgeon General's finding that secondhand smoke is unhealthy, Mike Thompson, company vice president and regional director, said Monday.


"We are trying to protect our employees and our customers. Sales is not the primary issue. It's about customer satisfaction," he said.
Bob Evans, founded in Gallipolis, as a trucker's diner that featured sausage, is now based in Columbus. It has 589 Bob Evans and 104 Mimi's Café restaurants nationwide and employs 50,810 people across the country.

The move was greeted with praise by local anti-smoking advocates such as Ahron Leichtman, director of the Greater Cincinnati Coalition on Smoking and Health and opponent of cigarette smoking who is working for a statewide ballot initiative to make all bars, restaurants, workplaces and public places smoke-free.

"It is long overdue," said Leichtman, who has crusaded against public smoking since 1969.

The 31 restaurants cover a wide geographic area, from Hillsboro and Wilmington in rural Ohio to the north, through suburban Cincinnati and into Northern Kentucky. The Chillicothe sites are not yet impacted, according to company officials.

"What I don't understand is why they didn't do this years ago because Bob Evans caters to families," Leichtman said.

Besides restaurants, Bob Evans Farms Inc. also is a leading producer and distributor of pork sausage and other convenience foods.

U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona last month found nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke increase their risk of developing heart disease by 25 percent to 30 percent, and their risk of lung cancer increases by 20 percent to 30 percent.

Most people want smoking kept out of restaurants, according to county-by-county results from SmokeFreeOhio, a campaign to gather petitions for a November ballot initiative to ban smoking from public places in Ohio.

SmokeFreeOhio surveyed Ohio residents in October 2005 and found 74 percent of people would eat out more often if smoking was banned from restaurants.

"We hear from people over and over again that they do not want to breathe-in smoke while they're eating," said Shelly Kiser, campaign communications director for SmokeFreeOhio.

http://hot-cigs.com/news/Jul-21-2006/La-Plata-Passes-Ban-on-Smoking.1294.html






The La Plata Town Council passed an ordinance Tuesday night that bans smoking in and around the town's restaurants and bars, a measure that is more stringent than the smoking ban that went into effect for Charles County last month.


The La Plata measure drew fire from some in the business community who say a smoking ban could hurt their revenue. About 40 residents attended Tuesday's council meeting, and several of them offered emphatic comments, fueling a 90-minute discussion of the ordinance. But with four affirmative votes -- Mayor Gene Ambrogio abstained -- the five-member council adopted the ban on smoking, which will go into effect Oct. 15 in the Charles County seat.

The council decided to hammer out the details of the ban, particularly those regarding enforcement, in separate working group meetings, and members said they are still open to suggestions from business owners and residents. But the basic structure was adopted for the ban on smoking in bars, restaurants and public places as well as within 20 feet of public entrances to commercial establishments.

The Charles County ban prohibits smoking in restaurants and outdoor facilities that are operated by the county, such as parks. Establishments such as bars where a majority of revenue is beverage-based are exempted from the ban.

The La Plata law is intended to keep people from smoking inside and at the entrance of public places. The ordinance was not designed to harm the business community or discriminate against people who smoke, said Ward 2 council member C. Keith Back, who introduced the measure. The council pledged Tuesday to retool the specific language of the ordinance if necessary so it does not unduly harm businesses.

"The intention is not to take away anyone's right to smoke," Back said. "They can smoke on their own property or 20 feet away from the entrance. The point is to protect the patrons and employees who are inside the restaurant or bar from secondhand smoke."

Council members promised an extensive campaign to educate residents and visitors about the smoking ban.

The comments of those who addressed the council at Tuesday's meeting varied, but most were critical of the proposal. Business owners raised questions about enforcement and worried that they would be responsible for policing their establishments. Council members said such issues would be resolved in the working groups they plan to convene.

Kathleen Quade, 49, of La Plata said she does not mind an ordinance to ban smoking in restaurants but thinks a ban in bars is too much.

"You're taking away the rights of individuals. Smoking is legal. Smoking tobacco is legal," she said. "Once you are in that adult age bracket, you have a right to choose whether you go into that establishment. And as a business owner, you have the right to decide whether you are a smoke-free establishment."

Some La Plata restaurants, which were not included in the countywide ban, already started smoking bans of their own. Outback Steakhouse, at Route 301 and Port Tobacco Road, instituted a ban so that it would have the same smoking policy as its sister restaurant in Waldorf.

"It seems to be working out for us," manager Ben Hoffmaster said. "We've had a very good turnout from our clientele. There have been very, very little complaints about it. A lot of praise in the fact that we have chosen to go nonsmoking."

Smoking bans in Charles seemed improbable not too long ago. For nearly three centuries, tobacco was Southern Maryland's premier cash crop. Tobacco once drove the economy in the tri-county area, which produced about 80 percent of the state's tobacco harvest.

But scientists have found secondhand smoke to be a leading cause of cancer. A recent Johns Hopkins University study commissioned by the American Cancer Society found that secondhand smoke costs Maryland $600 million a year in health care and lost wages due to illness.

Jurisdictions across the nation have instituted smoking bans in the past few years. At least 14 states have banned smoking in public places, although state lawmakers in Annapolis and Richmond rejected statewide bans this year.

In addition to Charles, several jurisdictions in the Washington region already have smoking bans. Montgomery, Prince George's and Talbot counties prohibit smoking in eating and drinking establishments. Howard County's ban on smoking in restaurants and bars will go into effect next month. In the District, smoking is banned in restaurant dining rooms, and the ban will be extended to bars, nightclubs and the bar areas of restaurants in January.

http://news.bbc.co.uk


The sculptor behind a life-size statue of Isambard Kingdom Brunel has denied he left out his cigar because of political correctness.

The bronze statue, at Brunel University in Uxbridge, west London, shows the engineer in his iconic top hat.

Anthony Stones said he had included the cigar as well in smaller models, but it looked wrong on the final statue.

"It's a minor prop. If a genius like Brunel needs a cigar, that's pretty sad really," he told the BBC.

The sculpture went up at the university on 6 July, to mark the bicentenary of Brunel's birth.

'Extremely pleased'

At the time Alan Bennett, the deputy director of the university's arts centre, said staff were "extremely pleased" with the result. He added that Mr Stones had gone to a lot of trouble to properly research the subject.

But there have been a few raised eyebrows at the decision not to include a cigar, when the engineer had a 40-a-day habit.

He even had a special carriage designed, capable of carrying 500 cigars and his drawing board.

Pro-smoking group Forest has said: "What next? Will Sherlock Holmes surrender his pipe? Will Sir Winston Churchill [also] be robbed of his cigar?"

It has been suggested that the cigar was left out because of fears students might snap it off.

But Mr Stones, a former president of the Society of Portrait Sculptors, said it was a purely asthetic decision, as it looked fine on the small scale models but strange on the full size statue.

"It trivialised the whole thing and it just didn't work, so I left it out," he told the BBC News website.

"If you look at statues of other famous cigar smokers, I can't think of a statue of Churchill with a cigar."

He added: "I was very pleased when I saw it unveiled at Uxbridge several weeks ago. It had vitality and equivalence to real life."

Robert Hulse, the curator at the Brunel Museum in Rotherhithe, south-east London, was among those at the unveiling.

He said: "I liked it. Like everyone there is a bit of a surprise when you think - will he have a cigar or won't he?

"It's unmistakeably him. It doesn't have a cigar, but it does have that square-shouldered, 'don't worry, I will build it for you' attitude. It's pugnacious and no-nonsense."

He said the row had started because a schoolbook had been published by Heinemann in early 2005 in which a cigar had been airbrushed out of the front cover photograph.

"It's all gone a bit daft," he added.

http://www.news-herald.com



You've probably taken your family to a restaurant and requested to sit in the non-smoking section. After all, neither you nor your spouse smoke and you don't want your children inhaling those noxious fumes.
But, invariably, the second-hand smoke wafts into the non-smoking section.
Everyone at the table eats their meal quickly, avoiding spending too much time breathing the air fellow diners have poisoned.
U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona threw more fire on the debate over second-hand smoke by reporting in late June that it is harmful to anyone.
Many would argue that announcement only confirms what Americans have known for several years.
He also called on states to adopt laws that ban smoking in public places.
The insidious nature of second-hand smoke makes it a worthy goal to protect the health of Ohioans in public places.
His plea comes as Ohio could be one of the battlegrounds in November in the ongoing squabble over indoor clean air policies. Both sides already have groups lined up to plead their case on a ballot issue.
The group SmokeFreeOhio is attempting to collect enough signatures to qualify the issue for the November ballot. It's uncertain now if that will happen. Eighteen states have adopted laws that invoke some restrictions on smoking in public places - with some outright bans at businesses and inside public places. Ohio only has communities or counties that have made indoor public places smoke-free.
Those communities were right to do so, and Ohio lawmakers should follow their lead.

Trying to save money
The Geauga County Department on Aging has identified a sensible way to help taxpayers with its home maintenance and farm market programs.
These programs will use means testing through November, requiring senior citizens to show proof of their income level. Otherwise, some seniors could pay for more than just materials for a project to install a ramp, railing or tub bars. They also could pay for part of the food received from the farm market.
We hope this proves successful and will continue long-term. Every government agency - at any level - spends taxpayer dollars.
And government must find ways to stretch the dollars it collects from us.

http://www.durangoherald.com



When does a state law not matter? Apparently when local officials do not feel like enforcing it.

That seems to be the case in the matter of a Durango bar whose management does not wish to abide by Colorado's recently enacted statewide smoking ban. A lawyer for the bar's owners offered an imaginative argument claiming that the establishment is exempt from the law, and the city essentially shrugged and said "OK."

It is a decision that usurps the role of the courts and flies in the face of the expressed will of the state Legislature.

The operators of Orio's Roadhouse, in the 600 block of Main Avenue, have not enforced the smoking ban. An attorney and an accountant representing the bar met with Durango's city manager, Bob Ledger, and argued that Orio's need not comply with the ban because it falls under an exemption that allows smoking in "cigar-tobacco" bars.

That provision was meant to grandfather in a half dozen or so cigar bars - all along the Front Range - whose owners have invested in large, expensive humidors that they then rent to patrons for cigar storage. To meet the definition of a cigar bar, an establishment must show that at least 5 percent of its gross income comes from "the on-site sale of tobacco products and the rental of on-site humidors." Those humidors must also have been in place by Dec. 31, 2005. No new cigar bars are allowed.

Orio's books apparently show that at least 5 percent of its gross income comes from tobacco sales. On that basis Ledger decided it was exempt. He then sent a memo to Durango Chief of Police Al Bell advising him that Orio's met the requirements for the exemption.

But what about a humidor? Orio's lawyer explained that away by saying that the "and" in "the on-site sale of tobacco products and the rental of on-site humidors" in the language of the law does not really mean "and." Instead, he says "and" really means "either, or, or a combination of both."

Ledger seems to have accepted that reasoning. His memo to Bell explains the exemption solely in terms of tobacco sales.

But the merits of the exemption notwithstanding, the question is why Ledger or anyone else at the city felt the need to get involved in the first place. It is not the city manager's role to interpret state law; we have courts for that. All the city needed to do was issue a citation and let Orio's lawyer present his argument about what "and" means to a judge.

Cogent arguments can be made to the effect that a smoking ban is unneeded, unwise, a violation of property rights or an infringement of personal liberty. The Legislature heard them all. It then - rightly - decided that the dangers inherent in public smoking outweighed those considerations.

Those who disagree are free to challenge the law in court. For a more lasting fix, they can carry their outrage to the polls and pick lawmakers more to their liking. Or, if they are really upset, they can start putting together their own ballot measure to overturn the ban.

But there is no "I don't want to" exemption to the smoking ban or any other state law. And the city manager has no business aiding an attempt to establish one.